“Curiosity killed the cat,” the saying goes.
In IT finance, curiosity is not the problem — unstructured curiosity is. Before you move from “I should probably look into AI” to applying it in your IT financial management, you need a clear view of what kinds of AI you’re dealing with and what they are (and are not) good at.
For IT finance, two families of models matter most right now:
In a recent video conversation with two fellow thought leaders, Nancy Braun, and Dr. Alexander Becker, we unpacked how these two types of models change the way we run IT finance — from reporting efficiency to forecasting accuracy and anomaly detection.
You can watch that discussion here: How to Match the Right AI Brain to IT Finance
This blog is the “orientation map” to that conversation. I’ll give you enough to get started on your AI journey — but I’ll leave some of the juicy details for the video and the whitepaper.
Think of LLMs and LQMs as two very different brains you can plug into your IT finance processes.
Large Language Models (LLMs) – the language brain
LLMs are trained on tokens (words, code, and other textual patterns). They excel at:
In finance, LLMs are increasingly used for report generation, narrative explanation, and self-service Q&A over financial data. But they have a big limitation: they are not calculators. Research shows that LLMs still struggle with precise numeric reasoning, especially over semi-structured financial data and complex math, and can produce plausible but wrong numbers.
Bottom line: LLMs are brilliant communicators, but you should not treat them as the system of record for your numbers.
Large Quantitative Models (LQMs) – the numbers brain
Large Quantitative Models are purpose-built AI systems optimized for numerical reasoning, forecasting, and complex data modelling. They’re trained on mathematical and financial datasets and are typically used for:
You can think of LQMs as a far more sophisticated successor to traditional time-series forecasting and econometric models — but at a scale and complexity suited for today’s IT and cloud environments.
Until recently, most LQMs were custom-built inside banks, trading firms, and a handful of large enterprises. Now we’re starting to see commercial distribution of LQMs via cloud platforms, such as SandboxAQ’s quantitative models offered on Google Cloud, explicitly positioned as complementary to LLMs (Reuters)
For IT finance leaders it is important to know:
You don’t need to rebuild your IT cost model to use LLMs. You can layer them on top of existing ITFM/TBM/FinOps tools and data to drive:
1. “Chat with your data”: self-service reporting & insight
LLMs can sit on top of your IT finance repository — allocations, service catalogs, GL, cloud cost data — and allow stakeholders to ask questions in natural language, such as:
“Why did storage costs for our customer portal increase in Q3?”
“Show me cloud spend per business unit vs. budget for the last 6 months.”
“Which applications are driving the most unplanned infrastructure costs?”
This does not replace your ITFM platform or data model — it exposes them in a more accessible way.
Value:
Used well, LLMs strip out mundane tasks, so your experts can focus on analysis, governance, and stakeholder engagement.
If LLMs let you talk to the numbers, LQMs reason with them. Here are three use cases:
1. Modern forecasting and scenario planning
LQMs are particularly powerful for predictive forecasting of IT spend across services, portfolios, and cloud resources. They can integrate:
For IT finance teams, this means moving from simple “run-rate plus X%” approaches to dynamic forecasting that can:
Examples: Run vendor invoices, cloud bills, or asset feeds through an LQM-powered quality layer before loading them into the cost model — catching unexpected values, patterns, or missing fields. This not only reduces manual checking; it also improves trust in your IT cost data, which is the foundation for any meaningful AI initiative.
Limitations you must respect
Before you deploy AI against your IT budget, a quick reality check:
LLMs – great with text, imperfect with numbers
LLMs are strong at:
However:
Be aware that there could be some hallucinations and mis-handle calculations and numeric context.
They must not be used as the source of record for financial statements, budgets, or allocations.
They need guardrails for data privacy and regulatory compliance, especially with sensitive IT cost and vendor data. For more details take a look at CFA Institute Research and Policy Center
Commercially, LLMs have a fast and easy onramp — embedded in many platforms and available via APIs — which is both their strength and their risk if governance is weak.
However:
They are not yet broadly available as off-the-shelf ITFM solutions; many are still custom-built or highly specialized.
They require strong data foundations (clean, well-modeled IT cost and usage data).
They need investment in skills (data science, MLOps, ITFM expertise) and clear model risk governance, especially in regulated industries.
On their own, neither LLMs nor LQMs fully “solve” IT finance. Together, they start to look like an intelligent assistant that can both think in numbers and speak in business language.
A few patterns we’re seeing:
LQM as the engine, LLM as the interface
Bidirectional feedback
Bridge between IT and Finance
If you are an IT leader or IT finance expert preparing to engage in AI, here are five pragmatic questions to answer upfront:
1. What business questions am I trying to answer?
Example: “Where can I reduce run costs by 10% without harming key services?”
Map those questions to LLM use cases (insight, explanation, productivity) and LQM use cases (forecasting, optimization, anomaly detection).
2. Is my IT cost and usage data ready?
Do you have a consistent ITFM/TBM model, service catalog, and cost allocation structure?
Do you have cloud and infrastructure usage data with enough granularity for meaningful forecasting and anomaly detection?
3. What guardrails do I need?
Define what data LLMs can and cannot access (sensitive vendor contracts, personnel data, etc.).
Establish human-in-the-loop checkpoints for anything affecting budgets, forecasts, or financial reporting.
Align with your organization’s model risk and compliance policies; regulators and professional bodies are already issuing guidance for AI in finance.See CFA Institute Research and Policy Center for more details.
4. Which capabilities should I buy vs. build?
Many ITFM/FinOps tools are embedding LLM capabilities for reporting, narrative generation, and guided analysis.
LQMs may come via specialized vendors or cloud providers or be developed in-house for your specific IT cost drivers and business model (more details in our whitepaper).
5. How do I organize the people side?
Create a joint CIO–CFO–FinOps/ITFM working group.
Make sure you have the right mix of skills: finance, IT operations, architecture, data science, and governance.
Treat AI in IT finance as an ongoing operating capability — not a one-off project.
This blog is intentionally a preview, not a playbook.
If you’re at the beginning of your AI journey in IT finance, your next step is not to “buy an AI,” but to decide which brain you need first, and where you can safely get early wins — while building the foundations for the combined LLM + LQM future.
And yes, stay curious — just make sure your curiosity is backed by clean data, clear use cases, and solid governance.